Advocacy is imparting knowledge about something you know to someone else so as to improve his quality of life (Royea & Appl, 2009). Prior to the roadshow, I thought people would find learning about Problem Gambling (PG) useless because it was not relatable to majority of the students. Similar to what I would do, I thought passers-by would avoid roadshows because they would feel it was a waste of time. Initially, I also felt a tinge of embarrassment for people to participate in our activities because I thought it was ‘lame’ for people my age to play ‘snake and ladders’. However, to my bewilderment, the visitor count at my booth exceeded my expectations and I realised that people were actually engaged in our activities. Most of our participants were our Psychology Studies (PCS) seniors, lecturers, foreigners, and students from other schools. I realise these groups of people were much more receptive to participate than other from Ngee Ann Polytechnic (NP) students in general. This could be due the rapport between PCS seniors and lecturers, as well as foreigners or students from other schools being more responsive in an unfamiliar environment (Leung, Koh, & Tam, 2015). It was heartening to see many people learning about PG and engaged in our roadshow, in contrast to my prior beliefs of how the implementation would be. Although advocacy is not my cup of tea because I fear the rejection of being turned down, I still feel it is necessary and not entirely useless. Indeed, advocacy is not easy as it requires a lot of endurance and one must not be easily intimidated by rejection. However, even if there is just one person who might be helped or impacted after 50 rejections, the hard work laboured is worthwhile because it value-adds to someone’s life, fulfilling the aim of advocacy.